Image Credit: Bethesda
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Microsoft heads to the Supreme Court again to dispute a class action lawsuit involving faulty disc drives.

Xbox 360 faces the Supreme Court in attempt to dodge class-action lawsuit over disc eating

Microsoft heads to the Supreme Court again to dispute a class action lawsuit involving faulty disc drives.
This article is over 8 years old and may contain outdated information

The Xbox 360, despite having hordes of loyal fans, was a terribly flawed system. Prone to overheating, the “Red Ring of Death”, piracy, and various other hardware issues, it comes as a surprise that the system didn’t go the way of the Dreamcast. However, a lesser known issue was that the Xbox 360 was known for scratching discs if the console was moved in the slightest while in use. Nine years after the Xbox 360 launch, Microsoft is headed back into court to avoid a class action lawsuit for the second time.

Recommended Videos

In 2007, a class action lawsuit was opened against Microsoft — headed by the Microsoft Hardware Program Manager Hiroo Umeno — that claimed the manufacturer was well aware of the damage that could be caused to discs when players re-positioned their consoles. The motion stated the following:

“This is … information that we as a team, optical disc drive team, knew about. When we first discovered the problem in September or October, when we got a first report of disc movement, we knew this is what’s causing the problem.”

Hiroo Umeno, Testimony

Microsoft allegedly rejected three possible solutions to the issue prior to the console’s release:

  1. Increase the magnetic force of the disc holder to keep discs in place. Microsoft reportedly rejected this due to concerns that it would affect the disc tray mechanism.
  2. Slow the disc rotation speed to 8x. This was ruled against due to much higher loading times.
  3. Install soft patches called “bumpers” that are found in many consumer optical disc drives. Microsoft refused this option as well, claiming that it was too expensive to install them at $0.50 per console.

As a result of their inaction, over 55,000 complaints from consumers popped up by April 2008. The company offered a replacement plan for the discs only which only replaced Microsoft games, and only after a $20 fee.

Nine years later, the Supreme Court is preparing to hear Microsoft’s pleas of innocence for the second time. According to a report by the Associated Press, the justices agreed on Friday to hear out an appeal from Microsoft, arguing that the individual claims by the plaintiffs had previously been thrown out. They reported that only 0.4% of 80 million owners who actually owned an Xbox 360 made complaints over disc scratching. As such, they argue that the damages are a result of consumer misuse, not a product defect.

As of January 15th, 2016, we are still awaiting the results of the Supreme Court’s hearing. Should the court rule in the plaintiffs’ favor, it will likely be another 5 years or more before we hear more news on this again.


GameSkinny is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of David Fisher
David Fisher
Author, GameSkinny columnist, and part-time childhood destroyer. David W. Fisher (otherwise known as RR-sama) is a no B.S. reviewer and journalist who will ensure that you get as close to the facts as humanly possible!