Image Credit: Bethesda
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.

Got Your Total War: Rome II on… Too Hard, or Too Easy?

Making the game “dumber!” Do you think it needs it? After all some one beat it in 16 turns!
This article is over 11 years old and may contain outdated information

How many people here can say they have beaten Total War: Rome II on the hardest difficulty?  How many people could say the same thing, but say they did it in 16 turns?

Recommended Videos

I personally have beaten the game on the hardest difficulty multiple times, but never in so little turns; but someone has done it and I would like to introduce the forum post of Genius the Restoration, a man who was able to Speed Run the Greeks to victory in little to no time.

Although this looks pretty fun and really puts your skills to the test, I really am disheartened that people can think the game would be this easy.  And I am hoping something more will come to Rome II.

I don’t want Rome to be too easy or too hard–or more importantly, all about the battles.  

Despite what some people think, the administrative side to Rome (building roads, mines, units) is the part I enjoy.  A recent post from some of the devs suggest that they will be removing this feature from the game, or “dumbing it down,”  making it easier to let the computer take it on and manage so that you as the player can just keep on jumping into the real time battles.  Gamespot highlights some of the changes that will be made tweaked in the new game, and I am interested to see the result, but at the same time dreading some of the decisions that will really reflect how the game turns out.

Also to consider in this is the success and failure of the last few Total War games–mainly Shogun 2.  I have never played it, but I hear that a lot of the elements that made the game complex have been removed, and that worries me.  I like complex systems, which take some figuring out and time to plan a strategy; if I really wanted to play something super simple with limited options, I would play a different game.

What I want people to get out of this is that I think Rome II will be an awesome game, but I am skeptical about the turnout of some of the decisions made by the company, and am really hoping to see some of the campaign map before the launch to better gauge how the game will play.

On a side note, does anyone know of some other people who have done similar things such as speed runs?  If so, please leave a comment, and would you try something like that–if you would, what faction would you be?  Personally I would be the Brutii, but I would probably need a few more turns in order to gain the popularity in order to take on Rome.

 

 


GameSkinny is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author